The newest web page was at the nature out of an exercise for me personally to display a sample of cuneiform creating and Sumerian phrases to help you an interested personal
> in which do “ohim” are from whenever you currently have the latest Este? otherwise in which El become >regarding in the first put?
There is absolutely no word El in Akkadian, but there are numerous Akkadian terminology beginning with El which means that ‘high, more than, over’.
>I found myself extremely pleased to see your web page into the Sumerian. I am currently strengthening >proverb profiles in the and you can wondered when the >you’d troubles posting the brand new proverb webpage on > or if it’s just >lower than build.
>Their webpage out-of Sumerian proverbs within is actually >unfortunately truncated; it appears as though the publish techniques is actually disrupted. >Your readers manage quite appreciate an entire version!
Sorry there aren’t alot more proverbs truth be told there, but it is required so much more due to the fact an example of Sumerian creating and you can words than simply as a list of proverbs.
To know why they stops the way that it can, you have to is actually hitting some of the cues inside the the brand new visual – some other part of the fresh new graphic is actually mapped so you’re able to invisible brands to have for every Sumerian keyword alone line.
When you find yourself seeking Sumerian proverbs, Bendt Alster has penned an extensive, certified guide in two quantities, Proverbs regarding Old Sumer, 1997, supplied by Eisenbraun’s, that you will find a link at my hyperlinks page.
Nevertheless, inside my >advice a powerful instance to possess for instance the Akkadian translations is one to >one can possibly get access to a much wider range of definition, hence a good >so much more precise comprehension of the latest Sumerian word’s particular meaning(s), >of the searching for brand new Akkadian translations for the AHw or CAD
>Dear sirs, navigating We came about your pages throughout the websites. In fact what >I must see is an audio apply for sumerian and you will ancient egyptian languages, >what are the? >could you offer your suggest.
Purchase the newest CMAA audio recording of one’s Joan Goodnick Westenholz lecture, Enheduanna: Little princess, Priestess, Poetess, from Will get 10, 1999 in which the lecturer comprehend a lot of Sumerian, recording WAW99-dos throughout the California Museum from Old Ways audiotape inventory.
There is also a link within my backlinks page out of short-term Sumerian and maybe Egyptian greetings regarding Voyager spacecraft number.
>I found myself merely questioning what your undertake “the latest Sumerian situation” try. I’m into the good >group at the NC Condition toward Civilizations of one’s Ancient near East and i was in fact >trying to mature dating gather feedback with the thus-titled Sumerian state. We have understand >as a result of Tom Jones’ book new Sumerian condition and you will are in all honesty stumped. Discover >research to suggest that they were indigenous to the room and you can there’s also >facts to suggest some additional influence. even a migration, possibly off >the new Indus Valley.
I believe that Sumerian ‘problem’ are a fantasy. The brand new Sumerian lexicon suggests continuity inside Mesopotamia and coexistence with the newest Akkadians. The fresh new map within my web site explains what i think in regards to the resource of the Sumerians.
The guy has been with the trees, fertility, and you will snakes. Thorkild Jacobsen penned the sources of your own tree mark diet away from strong below ground and have the look of entwining snakes.
Sure, this means lord of one’s an effective tree (or loyal unit). Either discover some interplay between your phrase getting tree and you may the term to possess knob, therefore he’s a jesus out of fertility together with.
>A highly basic question/complaint: why-not provide the Akkadian translations as >well? I am aware however not all the pupil from Sumerian knows Akkadian; >and this your stress is on Sumerian; and you can appropriately very.