The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.
The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.
The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.
This offered the newest theory the rationalist epistemology appears towards the an excellent cheaper amount of involvement with the Wedding subscale in addition to constructivist epistemology seems on an elevated standard of engagement to the Engagement subscale
Ergo, epistemology (rationalist vs. constructivist) try seen to be a critical predictor away from cures build. In particular, by far the most robust results render provisional support on the understanding you to there are specific differences in the personal sorts of the brand new specialist according to therapists’ epistemic presumptions. A great deal more particularly, the current study discovered that therapists having rationalist epistemologies tended toward a whole lot more distance, a lower degree of engagement, a narrower interest, and you can an elevated degree of thought within their courses with readers, while, the brand new constructivist epistemology tended with the which have an increased degree of intimacy, an elevated standard of wedding, a greater attention, plus sense of humor in their procedures courses. Concurrently, discover specific service on the perception that therapists which have constructivist epistemologies are likely on the the latest advice away from self-reliance in lieu of rigidity into the its cures build; not this was not an especially solid finding in today’s investigation.
Such findings are helpful about new potentially intrinsic differences was able by rationalist instead of constructivist epistemologies centered on therapy build. Way more specifically, latest results support the notion one to cognitive-behavioral therapies, hence depict the best depiction of one’s rationalist epistemology, care for a keen “active-directive” and you can logical way of therapy (Granvold, 1988) that have certain desires regularly package the course of your own tutorial (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).
Hypothesis dos-Epistemology Affects the latest Healing Relationship
Depending on the second theory-practitioners with rationalist epistemologies will rating highest towards Activity and you can Purpose subscales and lower toward Thread subscale compared to the constructivist epistemologies-some other numerous linear regression design try presented to decide in the event your exact same predictor changeable (counselor epistemology) carry out influence therapists’ recommendations of your own standards parameters (doing work alliance) based on therapists’ millions of about three subscales-Task, Goal, https://datingranking.net/quickflirt-review/ and you can Bond.